I think understanding the law is also paramount to understanding the times of the semiconductor industry.
Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984
Quote:
The Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984 (or SCPA) is an act of the US Congress that makes the layouts of integrated circuits legally protected upon registration, and hence illegal to copy without permission.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semicondu ... ct_of_1984I learned about this while studying former senator Gary Hart:
Quote:
Hart cosponsored the Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984 with Senator Charles Mathias, which was signed into law. The act created a new category of intellectual property rights for mask works for computer chips that protected the Silicon Valley from cheap foreign imitations.[10] Similar legislation had been proposed in every Congress since 1979.[10] It led to Hart being called the leader of the Atari Democrats.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_HartPrior to then, there wasn't a lot of protections for masks.
So what does this have to do with history or anything we know of today especially when it touches on something that happened over 40 years ago...??
Did Commodore have the full rights to the 6502 or did some rights still belong to Motorolla?
According to the Wikipedia article, Motorolla had 25 patents and Allen Bradley decided not to fight this case but sold his interest in MOS back to Motorola. Mike James took papers that belonged to Motorola and had to give them back. Motorolla was awarded $200,000 and both companies agreed to cross license microprocessor patents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOS_Technology_6502If they had to return the documents then was this technology really theirs and did they have full production rights?
Everyone thinks this is a moot point ( a question of no importance) because it happened over 40 years ago but this tells me what kind of climate and practices there were back then.